tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7124713.post924053734579824057..comments2008-12-04T20:05:23.423-08:00Jenniferhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08828157095687672044noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7124713.post-40633155606201898482008-12-04T20:05:23.423-08:002008-12-04T20:05:23.423-08:00Jennifer, I totally agree. While I might still be in high school reporting for the school newspaper, I can really tell that the article is an example of bad journalism. How did that article end up on PAGE 1!? Does it really deserve a page at all? The Chronicle needs to reconsider about what they are covering in their newspaper. Like the New York Times slogan states, the Chronicle needs to only "Print the news that's fit to print".Rexly Peñaflorida IIhttp://www.heirdeux.1up.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7124713.post-87992152822636303852008-12-01T04:26:48.920-08:002008-12-01T04:26:48.920-08:00Hey, If you can't complain on your own blog where can you complain? haha...Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7124713.post-78972221287228424362008-11-30T18:34:30.367-08:002008-11-30T18:34:30.367-08:00That article reads like an angry message board post and it made me laugh on the inside...<BR/><BR/>Why does that sound familiar...Duck_Hunter007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7124713.post-41993466128876540672008-11-30T09:45:37.765-08:002008-11-30T09:45:37.765-08:00It's not just the San Francisco Chronicle. It seems more like newspaper journalism in general. My family has stopped subscribing to the local paper for years because of the lack of quality reporting.Marknoreply@blogger.com